Skip to main content

note

1. Cultural hegemony (Antonio Gramsci)​

What it means (theory)​

Cultural hegemony means:
Power is maintained not mainly by force, but by controlling what is considered:

  • “normal”

  • “educated”

  • “progressive”

  • “acceptable speech”

If people internalize those values, the state does not need violence most of the time.

How it works in practice​

  • University syllabi

  • NGO language

  • Media framing

  • English-speaking elites

  • “Respectable” activism

You win when your worldview becomes “common sense”.

Why Muslims are targeted​

Islam is a complete moral system that does not need elite validation. That makes it resistant to cultural control.

So Islam is reframed as:

  • backward

  • emotional

  • unsafe

  • anti-progress

Once that frame is normalized, repression looks “reasonable”.

2. Discursive power (Michel Foucault)​

What it means​

Whoever controls language controls:

  • what questions can be asked

  • what answers sound legitimate

  • what topics are “dangerous”

Power flows through discourse, not just institutions.

In practice​

  • “Islamist” vs “activist”

  • “Radical” vs “conservative”

  • “Freedom of expression” when insulting Muslims

  • “Public order” when Muslims respond

Same action, different label.

Key insight​

If you lose discursive power, even peaceful protest can be criminalized.

That is why bullets come after language fails.

What it means​

Public consent for repression is manufactured through:

  • selective coverage

  • omission

  • repetition

  • emotional framing

People think repression is “necessary”.

In BD context​

  • Muslim protests shown as chaotic

  • Secular violence minimized or justified

  • State brutality framed as “stability”

  • Victims turned into “security threats”

Shapla was not only physical violence. It was narrative erasure.

No pictures, no names, no mourning.

4. NGO-ization of politics​

What it means​

Political struggle is moved from:

  • masses

  • streets

  • communities

into:

  • project proposals

  • donor language

  • workshops

  • reports

This favors:

  • English speakers

  • elite networks

  • depoliticized activism

Effect on Muslims​

Mosques, madrasas, and grassroots networks are excluded as “informal” or “unsafe”.

Only those who speak donor language are considered legitimate.

This creates a representation monopoly.

5. The “civil society” myth​

Theory​

Civil society is supposed to be neutral space between state and people.

Reality​

In many post-colonial states, “civil society”:

  • overlaps with ruling elites

  • protects regime legitimacy

  • absorbs dissent before it becomes dangerous

Why it helps fascists​

When authoritarian governments crack down, civil society actors:

  • stay silent

  • justify it as “complex”

  • condemn only one side

They are not deep state in a conspiracy sense, but functional partners.

6. Selective secularism​

What it claims​

Secularism = neutrality of state.

What often happens​

  • Religion tolerated only when privatized

  • Muslim public presence treated as threat

  • Cultural Islam allowed

  • Political Islam criminalized

Other ideologies are treated as “opinions”.
Islam is treated as a “risk factor”.

That is not neutrality.

7. Securitization (Copenhagen School)​

What it means​

An issue is framed as a security threat so:

  • normal rules are suspended

  • extraordinary measures are justified

Application to Muslims​

  • Mosques become “sites”

  • Beards become “signals”

  • Charity becomes “financing”

  • Speech becomes “incitement”

Once securitized, rights disappear quietly.

This is why peaceful protest can end in bullets with public silence.

8. Why left-liberal elites fear Muslims (not hate, fear)​

Important distinction.

They fear:

  • Moral absolutism

  • Mass mobilization without elite mediation

  • Non-Western epistemology

  • Accountability to God, not institutions

A Muslim who does not need approval is unpredictable.

So the response is containment, not dialogue.

9. Why protests alone fail​

Street protests fail when:

  • There is no documentation

  • No English narrative

  • No international echo

  • No institutional pressure

Power waits. Media ignores. Then repression happens quietly.

Bullets come after isolation is complete.

10. What you should be seeing (pattern recognition)​

Watch for:

  • Language shifts before violence

  • Media silence before crackdowns

  • NGO statements that condemn “both sides”

  • Academic framing that dehumanizes Muslims

  • International praise for “stability”

Violence is the last step, not the first.

11. What to do (strategic, not emotional)​

I will keep this strictly non-violent and realistic.

A. Compete in language, not volume​

  • Learn rights vocabulary

  • Learn legal framing

  • Learn international norms

B. Document before mobilizing​

  • Names

  • Dates

  • Photos

  • Sources

Evidence protects lives more than crowds.

C. Decentralize leadership​

  • No single face

  • No hero dependency

D. Build slow legitimacy​

  • Journalists

  • Academics

  • Lawyers

  • International observers

E. Refuse the rage trap​

Anger is understandable.
But rage is what justifies repression.

Calm, disciplined Muslims break the script.

One last thing, very important​

Understanding this does not mean all secular people are enemies.
It means:

  • power structures behave predictably

  • ideologies protect themselves

  • Muslims must grow intellectually to survive politically